- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:33:06 -0400
- To: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
- Cc: sanjiva@watson.ibm.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
At 12:49 PM 9/12/2003 -0400, Amelia A. Lewis wrote: >On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:32:16 -0400 >David Booth <dbooth@w3.org> wrote: > > > On yesterday's WS Arch WG call, the WG confirmed agreement on the > > following terminology for the parties involved in an interaction: > > > > Terms to Avoid Terms to Use Instead > > ============== ==================== > > client, consumer requester > > server Web service, service or provider > > > > Maybe we should follow the WSA WG's lead in our documents as well? > >Since a subscriber is *not* a requester, nor is the second participating >node in any output-first operation, I would prefer to avoid making these >mistakes, even if they can be justified by pointing out that WSA made >them first. That was pointed out during discussions in the WSA WG, but we didn't have any better ideas that got any traction. -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 15:33:07 UTC