Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF from Sanjiva Weerawarana on 2003-09-30 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from September 2003)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:30:47 +0600
To: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <030c01c38780$f9ab42a0$72545ecb@lankabook2>

Hi Amy,

> I wasn't asked to supply justification for the outbound-first
> operations, which TIBCO *has* advocated, strongly.  The disappearance of
> the old multicast solicit response is a result of changes in the
> definitions, such that the outbound-first operations are now,
> theoretically (apart from the trifling problem that fault replaces
> message is probably inappropriate), modeled by existing outbound-first
> patterns.

I'm more confused. We still have the old solicit-response and 
output-only patterns, at least as of the Sept. F2F! What's the
diff between what we have now and what was in WSDL 1.1? 

Clearly I haven't understood this pattern stuff at all. I wonder
how users will deal with it.

Sanjiva.

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 14:31:12 UTC