- From: Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:44:54 -0700
- To: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Umit Yalcinalp wrote: > > Looking at the latest part one doc, I don't see any of the rpc encoding > rules that we have worked on via email and at the last f2f. For an > outsider who reads the current document, there is no indication such > that there is (going to be) an established URI that indicates RPC style > encoding rules, and the set of rules that the operation (aka > messageExchange) must adhere to. I thought we decided to add the rules > and although the encodingStyle is optional, we also decided that the > (missing) rules, if the value is present, were normative. > > Am I missing something or has the spec not included the rules yet? The rules haven't been included yet. My recollection is that at the last face-to-face we agreed we'd define them in the spec, but that what we had at the time wasn't quite polished enough, so that we'd finalize them at the following face-to-face. I can add an editorial note before section 2.3.1 saying that we're waiting for the "RPC encoding style" rules to be defined. How does that sound? Roberto -- Roberto Chinnici Java Web Services Sun Microsystems, Inc. roberto.chinnici@sun.com
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 12:43:39 UTC