- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:08:31 +0600
- To: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>, "'WS Description List'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I included the list of rules in the draft earlier today. Umit, can you take the action item to propose a solid list of rules? What I proposed is a starter set .. Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com> To: "'WS Description List'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:53 PM Subject: RE: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing i n Part 1 > > > I seem to recall that Sanjiva had the rules on a slide and I believed them to be complete and correct, if not formally adopted. > > Can we review them at the F2F next week and get them final? > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia Server Development > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roberto Chinnici [mailto:Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 12:44 PM > To: Umit Yalcinalp > Cc: Jeffrey Schlimmer; WS Description List > Subject: Re: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing in Part 1 > > > Umit Yalcinalp wrote: > > > > Looking at the latest part one doc, I don't see any of the rpc encoding > > rules that we have worked on via email and at the last f2f. For an > > outsider who reads the current document, there is no indication such > > that there is (going to be) an established URI that indicates RPC style > > encoding rules, and the set of rules that the operation (aka > > messageExchange) must adhere to. I thought we decided to add the rules > > and although the encodingStyle is optional, we also decided that the > > (missing) rules, if the value is present, were normative. > > > > Am I missing something or has the spec not included the rules yet? > > The rules haven't been included yet. My recollection is that at the > last face-to-face we agreed we'd define them in the spec, but that > what we had at the time wasn't quite polished enough, so that we'd > finalize them at the following face-to-face. I can add an editorial > note before section 2.3.1 saying that we're waiting for the "RPC > encoding style" rules to be defined. How does that sound? > > Roberto > > -- > Roberto Chinnici > Java Web Services > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > roberto.chinnici@sun.com
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 11:12:10 UTC