- From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:53:05 -0400
- To: 'WS Description List' <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I seem to recall that Sanjiva had the rules on a slide and I believed them to be complete and correct, if not formally adopted. Can we review them at the F2F next week and get them final? -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development -----Original Message----- From: Roberto Chinnici [mailto:Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 12:44 PM To: Umit Yalcinalp Cc: Jeffrey Schlimmer; WS Description List Subject: Re: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing in Part 1 Umit Yalcinalp wrote: > > Looking at the latest part one doc, I don't see any of the rpc encoding > rules that we have worked on via email and at the last f2f. For an > outsider who reads the current document, there is no indication such > that there is (going to be) an established URI that indicates RPC style > encoding rules, and the set of rules that the operation (aka > messageExchange) must adhere to. I thought we decided to add the rules > and although the encodingStyle is optional, we also decided that the > (missing) rules, if the value is present, were normative. > > Am I missing something or has the spec not included the rules yet? The rules haven't been included yet. My recollection is that at the last face-to-face we agreed we'd define them in the spec, but that what we had at the time wasn't quite polished enough, so that we'd finalize them at the following face-to-face. I can add an editorial note before section 2.3.1 saying that we're waiting for the "RPC encoding style" rules to be defined. How does that sound? Roberto -- Roberto Chinnici Java Web Services Sun Microsystems, Inc. roberto.chinnici@sun.com
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 10:52:53 UTC