- From: Amelia A. Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:49:03 -0400
- To: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Cc: sanjiva@watson.ibm.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:32:16 -0400 David Booth <dbooth@w3.org> wrote: > On yesterday's WS Arch WG call, the WG confirmed agreement on the > following terminology for the parties involved in an interaction: > > Terms to Avoid Terms to Use Instead > ============== ==================== > client, consumer requester > server Web service, service or provider > > Maybe we should follow the WSA WG's lead in our documents as well? Since a subscriber is *not* a requester, nor is the second participating node in any output-first operation, I would prefer to avoid making these mistakes, even if they can be justified by pointing out that WSA made them first. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 12:49:37 UTC