rationale for status quo for fault references?

• From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:39:39 +0600
• To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <055201c386c9$d015bd60$72545ecb@lankabook2>

Can someone please point me to the discussion that lead to the 
status quo for fault refs [1] which has pointers to >= 1 
messages? WSDL 1.1 had a pointer to one and I'm curious why
we decided make that be >= 1.

Thanks,

Sanjiva.

[1] http://tinyurl.com/p3dg

Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 16:40:06 UTC