- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:58:21 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Logistics [1], dial-in numbers [2] (members only).
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/3/07/f2fSeptLogistics.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/3/07/f2fSeptLogistics.html#Bridge
--------------------------------------------------------
Monday 22 September
--------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Introductions and logistics
- Assignment of scribes
@@@
- Agenda fine-tuning
09:15 Removing message. New Draft [3], schema [4]
- Countdown to close the following issues [5].
* Issue 27: Remove 'style' attribute [6]
* Issue 39: Binding extensions depend on structure of
portType [7]
* Issue 40: Binding extensions for SOAP interact in a
complex way [8]
* Issue 45: fault/@use should be optional [9]
* Issue 48: soap:body/@use should be optional [10]
* Issue 63: soap binding violates separation of abstract
and concrete [11]
[3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml
[4] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xsd
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Aug/0004.html
[6] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x27
[7] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x39
[8] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x40
[9] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x45
[10] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x48
[11] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x63
9:30 R085 Describing endpoint references. [12]
- General agreement to add such capability to WSDL, but
not agreement on the precise form of the annotations and
where in the WSDL they should reside. Proposal
from Umit [13], response from Arthur [14].
- Related issue (?) dynamic discovery of a service [15].
- Arthur to work with Umit to unify approaches.
[12]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/att-0088/R085-20
03-04-22.html
[13]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/att-0024/umit_pr
oposal.html__charset_ISO-8859-1
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0142.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0004.html
10:30 Break
10:50 Endpoint references (cont.)
12:00 Lunch
13:00 Attributes
- TF revised proposal [16]
[16] TBD
15:00 Break
15:20 Attributes (cont.)
17:30 Adjourn
-------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday 23 September
-------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Patterns. New draft [20]
- Choose specific patterns for the standard [21]:
1. TF recommendation: drop request-response and multicast-
solicit-response patterns, as subsumed by others [22].
2. Sanjiva's proposal: drop any pattern not used in a
normative binding in our spec.
3. Tom's proposal: drop the "multi" patterns.
4. Amy's proposal: at least the patterns in WSDL 1.1.
[20]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.
xml
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Aug/0010.html
[22]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/rec
ommendations_clean.htm
10:30 Break
10:50 Patterns (cont.)
11:15 WSDL Validator demo (Arthur)
12:00 Lunch
13:00 Binding enhancements. New draft [23, 24]
- Unresolved proposal: Drop <soap:binding>: drop @protocol, change
<soap:address>: add @protocol.
- Issue #80: Inappropriate name for binding component [25].
- Issue #81: Match between binding/@interface and
service/@interface should account for interface
inheritance. [26]
- Issue #82: Relax binding syntax constraints in favor of
semantic constraints [27]
- Issue #83: Specify interaction between binding extensions [28]
- Issue #84: Are SOAP header faults needed? [29]
- Issue #85: HTTP (non-SOAP) binding depends on message/part [30]
Philippe to make proposal.
- Issue #86: Should we define a new binding element for
default rule for wsoap:operation/@soapActionURI.
Proposal = interfaceTNS#operation-name. [31]
[23]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml#Bindi
ng
[24]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml#Endpo
int [25] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x80
[26] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x81
[27] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x82
[28] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x83
[29] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x84
[30] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x85
[31] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x86
15:00 Break
15:20 Binding Enhancements (cont.)
17:30 Adjourn
-------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday 23 September
-------------------------------------------------------
09:00 TBD
10:30 Break
10:50 TBD
12:00 Adjourn [32]
[32] http://www.cdsusa.com/
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 19:58:24 UTC