RE: On WSDL "operation"

Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> I'm for keeping operations. I think services aren't there to exchange
> messages, they are there to *serve*, and if message exchange is
> necessary for that (as it usually is), it ought to be specified in the
> container that identifies (not defines, though) the particular serving
> operation that the service is capable of.


+1  

I am pretty violently opposed to changing the name of the operation element.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia

Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 10:40:41 UTC