Re: The attribute formerly known as "name"

I have, so far, six responses (as well as my own).  Could anyone else
willing to express an opinion please drop a line soon-ish?  I'll
summarize by COB EDT tomorrow.

Amy!
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:19:19 -0400
"Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com> wrote:
> As promised, here is a list of suggestions to rename the attribute
> "name", when it appears on the elements "input", "output", and
> "fault". This list of proposed replacements is in accord with issue
> 77, which suggested that this instance of the usage of "name" as an
> attribute was not consistent with other usages throughout the
> specification.
> 
> Several proposals for replacement were made on the 4 September
> teleconference.  Please respond to this email using preference voting,
> indicating your top three preferences (number them 1, 2, and 3,
> please).
>  I'll try to tabulate responses that I receive (either publicly or
> off-list) immediately before the teleconference next week.  Note that
> you are free to propose an alternative not listed here as well.
> 
> role
> 
> messageRole
> 
> messageType
> 
> messageName
> 
> messageReference
> 
> message
> 
> reference
> 
> identifier
> 
> Amy!
> (that's my name, not a proposal ...)
> -- 
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
> 
> 


-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com

Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 12:41:24 UTC