public-sdw-wg@w3.org from June 2015 by author

Alejandro Llaves

• RE: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: proposed change to UC & Req doc to use issue numbers from tracker (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: More UCR comments (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: comments on UCR (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Quick review of the UCR doc (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Editorial amendments to UCR (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: any chance of that? (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: any chance of that? (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Temporal reference system (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Editorial amendments to UCR (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: The model reuse requirement (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements? (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Nominal temporal references (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Spatial vagueness (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: The positioning system requirement (Monday, 1 June)

Andrea Perego

• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Comments on Data on the Web Best Practices: BP-1 & BP-2 (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Review of UC4.43 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Review of UC4.42 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Regrets for next call (Monday, 8 June)
• The making of Leaflet: lessons learnt (Thursday, 4 June)
• Likely regrets (was: Re: SDWWG Next Meeting) (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Temporal reference system (Monday, 1 June)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Regrets for today (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Regret for today (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Regrets for the next call (Tuesday, 2 June)

Bill Roberts

• Re: About the Spatial Meronymy and Spatial Operators requirements (help needed!) (Monday, 1 June)

Bruce Bannerman

• Misuse of spatial data [was: Re: BP Principles- more added] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 1 June)

chaals@yandex-team.ru

• Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June (Tuesday, 23 June)

Christine Perey

• Re: Regrets for this weeks call (Tuesday, 16 June)

Clemens Portele

• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Frozen copy? (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: More UCR comments (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: More UCR comments (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [SDWWG] SDWWG Next Meeting (Wednesday, 3 June)
• More UCR comments (Tuesday, 2 June)

Ed Parsons

• SDWWG Next Meeting (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: the Best Practices skeleton (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: the Best Practices skeleton (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Monday, 22 June)
• SDWWG Next Meeting (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Landing page for SDW documents on w3c.github.io (Wednesday, 10 June)
• SDWWG Next Meeting (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements? (Monday, 1 June)

Frans Knibbe

• Re: the Best Practices skeleton (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• the Best Practices skeleton (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Monday, 22 June)
• Resolving UCR issues (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Review of UC4.43 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Review of UC4.42 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Frozen copy? (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [sdw] created FPWD for use case doc and fixed validation errors (#7) (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Use of "note" CSS class in UCR doc (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Frozen copy? (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Making a public snapshot from the GitHub repo (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Linking to candidate requirements from the UCR document (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: compound use cases (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: More UCR comments (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Quick review of the UCR doc (Friday, 5 June)
• The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: The making of Leaflet: lessons learnt (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Temporal reference system (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: The model reuse requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• Linking to candidate requirements from the UCR document (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: The positioning system requirement (Monday, 1 June)
• simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements? (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data (Monday, 1 June)
• The 'valid time' requirement (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: any chance of that? (Monday, 1 June)

Heaven, Rachel E.

• RE: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Friday, 26 June)
• RE: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Tuesday, 16 June)
• RE: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Wednesday, 3 June)
• comments on UCR (Tuesday, 2 June)

Jeremy Tandy

• Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Regrets for this weeks call (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 15 June)
• BP Principles- more added (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Making a public snapshot from the GitHub repo (Thursday, 11 June)
• Making a public snapshot from the GitHub repo (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: proposed change to UC & Req doc to use issue numbers from tracker (Wednesday, 10 June)
• proposed change to UC & Req doc to use issue numbers from tracker (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Landing page for SDW documents on w3c.github.io (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: FW: Geospatial-semantic Exploration on the Move [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group] (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: The making of Leaflet: lessons learnt (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Use of "note" CSS class in UCR doc (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: any chance of that? (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Editorial amendments to UCR (Tuesday, 2 June)
• How to refer to issues on the tracker from the Use Case doc (Tuesday, 2 June)

Joshua Lieberman

• Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Meeting 150624 regrets (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: BP Principles- more added [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Geospatial-semantic Exploration on the Move [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group] (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Friday, 5 June)

Kerry Taylor

• Re: the Best Practices skeleton (Monday, 29 June)
• Fwd: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Thursday, 25 June)
• Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Wednesday, 24 June)
• [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June (Tuesday, 23 June)
• will put this ISSUE-10 re CRS on the agenda for tomorrow. (Tuesday, 23 June)

Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au

• 2nd CFP: ISWC 2015 Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks and Terra Cognita (Thursday, 18 June)
• RE: Frozen copy? (Wednesday, 10 June)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Tuesday, 9 June)
• [SDWWG] agenda for meeting this week (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RE: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RE: Quick review of the UCR doc (Wednesday, 3 June)

Krzysztof Janowicz

• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)

Linda van den Brink

• RE: the Best Practices skeleton (Monday, 29 June)
• RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• RE: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Thursday, 25 June)
• RE: Quick review of the UCR doc (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Quick review of the UCR doc (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements? (Tuesday, 2 June)

Little, Chris

• Dynamic CRS Datums. Was: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s) (Tuesday, 30 June)
• RE: Quick review of the UCR doc (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RE: Temporal reference system (Tuesday, 2 June)

matthew perry

• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Friday, 26 June)

Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)

• Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Thursday, 18 June)

p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk

• Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Regrets for this weeks call (Tuesday, 16 June)

Peter Baumann

• Re: Dynamic CRS Datums. Was: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s) (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Frozen copy? (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Frozen copy? (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Frozen copy? (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: The model reuse requirement (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: The model reuse requirement (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: The model reuse requirement (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: The model reuse requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: comments on UCR (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Georeferenced sensor and coverage data (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: UCR issue: phrasing of CRS requirement(s) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement (Monday, 1 June)

Phil Archer

• Re: Resolving UCR issues (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Kicking off Editorial DRAFT of BP Document (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [Minutes] 2015-06-17 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• [Minutes] 2015-06-17 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC (Monday, 15 June)
• [Minutes] 2015-06-10 (Thursday, 11 June)
• Frozen copy? (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Geofencing API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• [Minutes] 2015-06-03 (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Editorial amendments to UCR (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Editorial amendments to UCR (Monday, 1 June)
• [Minutes] 2015-05-27 (Monday, 1 June)

Philippe Thiran

• Re: [SDWWG] Next meeting Wed 24 June (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Regrets for the next call (Wednesday, 3 June)

Raphaël Troncy

• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)

Scott Serich

• Re: Use of the word 'standard' in the UCR document. (Thursday, 25 June)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• RE: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC (Tuesday, 30 June)
• RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Sunday, 28 June)
• RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Friday, 26 June)
• RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Thursday, 18 June)
• RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 17 June)
• RE: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC (Tuesday, 16 June)
• RE: Frozen copy? (Saturday, 13 June)
• RE: Frozen copy? (Wednesday, 10 June)
• RE: [SDWWG] agenda for meeting this week (Wednesday, 10 June)
• RE: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• RE: The model reuse requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• RE: Temporal reference system (Friday, 5 June)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Friday, 5 June)
• RE: The model reuse requirement (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: Temporal reference system (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Thursday, 4 June)
• UCR snapshot uploaded to OGC portal (Thursday, 4 June)
• FW: Geospatial-semantic Exploration on the Move [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group] (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Tuesday, 2 June)

Stefan Lemme

• Re: simplicity or web developer friendliness as requirements? (Wednesday, 3 June)

Svensson, Lars

• RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Thursday, 25 June)
• RE: Issue-10 unresolved in meeting today (Wednesday, 24 June)
• RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Wednesday, 24 June)
• RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Monday, 22 June)
• RE: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage (Friday, 19 June)
• RE: Temporal reference system (Tuesday, 9 June)
• RE: [SDWWG] agenda for meeting this week (Monday, 8 June)

Thiago José Tavares Ávila

• Re: the Best Practices skeleton (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: the Best Practices skeleton (Sunday, 28 June)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 20:24:24 UTC