Re: Quick review of the UCR doc

2015-06-03 14:31 GMT+02:00 Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>:

> Hi Linda,
>
> thanks for your comments! See my answers below:
>
> On 2 June 2015 at 10:13, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I went through the Requirements section of the UCR doc this morning and
>> have some comments. Here they are:
>>
>>
>>
>> -          5.36: I do not see the spatial aspect of this requirement.
>>
> Have in mind that the group is not only about "spatial" aspects, but about
> "spatial data on the Web" aspects. This is the reason to find requirements
> on provenance, quality metadata, reference data chunks or reference
> external vocabularies, which may be not directly related to "spatial"
> issues. If the group decides to remove this kind of requirements, fine.
>

I have just created an issue and a separate thread for this requirement.

Greetings,
Frans

Received on Friday, 5 June 2015 15:58:46 UTC