W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2015

Editorial amendments to UCR

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:12:29 +0100
Message-ID: <556CD8CD.9070204@w3.org>
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
Frans, Alejandro,

I've been through the UCR today to make editorial changes of two types:
- native speaker edits;
- simplifying the spelling for our American friends (they do get so 
upset with metres and optimisations).

I've also added a skeleton Acknowledgements section - to which you may 
or may not choose to add specific names.

I've sent a pull request that you may or may not wish to accept.

In doing this, I also have some more substantive comments (below). 
*None* of these, IMO, should be a brake on publishing an FPWD of the 
doc, they're just links between UCs that came to mind as I read through 
them all (yes, I read the doc from start to finish!).

Not all the related requirements seem to show up. This might be a ReSpec 
thing, but it might be more serious. For example, Locating A Thing has

<p class="relatedRequirements"><a href="#TimeDependentCRS"></a></p>

But the text isn't being written into the hyperlink. Can you check these 
through please?

use Cases 4.7 and 4.8 (your two Frans) perhaps relate to Andrea's one on 
the GeoDCAT-AP as well?

4.9 seems to relate to Ed's 4.6

4.9 also seems to relate to 5.45 and 5.51

4.10 refers to identifiers. The DWBP's BP Doc has a section on this - 
that I have an action item to improve in the coming 24 hours or so. That 
*might* be enough for SDW but time will tell.

4.14 seems to call for things like ID management, privacy etc. ?

4.15 has this:
* Agreed-upon vocabulary for metadata about spatial datasets

Which seems to relate to 4.7, 4.8 and Andrea's GeoDCAT one.

4.16 seems to call for very similar issues as 4.15. might they be combined?

4.18 has:
* user can subset the data by x,y,z limits

which looks like Jeremy's UC (4.2) ? See also 4.35 and 4.37

4.22 again looks like it relates to 4.7 and 4.8

4.24 looks really interesting - but what's the spatial angle?

4.28 looks very similar to Manolis's work on Greek forest fires - can 
they be combined do you think?

4.33 Seems to call for detailed provenance info - might that be a new req?

4.47 sounds like a whole new WG!




Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead

+44 (0)7887 767755
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 22:12:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:17 UTC