Re: Spatial vagueness

Sure, I will add examples from the use cases to both requirements.

Alejandro

On 29 May 2015 at 15:22, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:

> An addition: I think the same goes for the temporal sister requirement: Temporal
> vagueness
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#TemporalVagueness>
> .
>
> Regards,
> Frans
>
> 2015-05-29 15:19 GMT+02:00 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>:
>
>> Hello Alejandro,
>>
>> I think I understand what the Spatial vagueness
>> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialVagueness>
>> requirement ("It should be possible to describe locations in a vague,
>> imprecise manner.") is about. But I think that with the current phrasing it
>> will be hard to check whether our deliverables will meet this requirement.
>> In other words, I think the vagueness requirement is too vague :-).
>>
>> Perhaps we should add some examples of spatial vagueness that should be
>> possible to express as spatial data on the web? That could help in making
>> the requirement testable.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Frans
>>
>>
>> --
>> Frans Knibbe
>> Geodan
>> President Kennedylaan 1
>> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>>
>> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>> www.geodan.nl
>> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Frans Knibbe
> Geodan
> President Kennedylaan 1
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
> www.geodan.nl
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>


-- 
Alejandro Llaves

Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

Artificial Intelligence Department

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Avda. Montepríncipe s/n

Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain


http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves


allaves@fi.upm.es