W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Quick review of the UCR doc

From: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:31:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CABTzy2Q6Z172Tt_bsp3nsUR-2BUX0-MCbaOROHDuhAXOq_=sMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Cc: "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hi Linda,

thanks for your comments! See my answers below:

On 2 June 2015 at 10:13, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
>
>
> I went through the Requirements section of the UCR doc this morning and
> have some comments. Here they are:
>
>
>
> -          5.36: I do not see the spatial aspect of this requirement.
>
Have in mind that the group is not only about "spatial" aspects, but about
"spatial data on the Web" aspects. This is the reason to find requirements
on provenance, quality metadata, reference data chunks or reference
external vocabularies, which may be not directly related to "spatial"
issues. If the group decides to remove this kind of requirements, fine.


>  -          5.42: I thought the requirement was not only for metadata for
> datasets/sources, but also for metadata for individual data objects. E.g UC
> 4.39 seems to need this (crowdsourced spatial data), also UC 4.30.
>

True, I changed the first sentence of the requirement to "There should be
standards that allow describing the spatial characteristics of data (data
objects, data sets or data services), like:"



>  -          5.49: typo: s/Referene/Reference
>

Fixed

>  -          5.55: Title is “Use in computational models” but text below
> doesn’t fit this, “It must be possible to represent uncertainty in
> observations.” (probably copied from 5.54)
>
Fixed


>  -          Now that I’ve looked at the whole list I’m missing a
> requirement about visualising spatial data on the web. Something like “It
> should be possible to publish cartographic stylesheets (in e.g. CartoCSS,
> SLD/SE) alongside web-enabled spatial data.” However, none of the use cases
> we’ve assembled mention this! I find it curious, does anyone think we need
> this?
>
Good! Could you please raise an issue to be discussed in future telecons? A
related use case would also be valuable.


>  Linda
>
>
>
> *__________________________________**____*
>
> *Geonovum*
>
> *Linda van den Brink*
>
> *Adviseur Geo-standaarden*
>
>
>
> *a*: Barchman Wuytierslaan 10, 3818 LH Amersfoort
>
> *p*: Postbus 508, 3800 AM Amersfoort
>
> *t*:  + 31 (0)33 46041 00
>
> *m*: + 31 (0)6 1355 57 92
>
> *e:  *l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl <r.beltman@geonovum.nl>
>
> *i*:  www.geonovum.nl
>
>
>


Cheers,
Alejandro

-- 
Alejandro Llaves

Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

Artificial Intelligence Department

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Avda. Montepríncipe s/n

Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain


http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves


allaves@fi.upm.es
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 12:31:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 2 September 2016 12:03:03 UTC