Re: any chance of that?

Ok, I have just added this use case to the UCR document (proof
<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SmartCities>)
and I have linked it to two deliverables and three requirements.

Regards,
Frans

2015-05-27 9:32 GMT+02:00 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>:

> Hello Payam, Alejandro,
>
> Thank you Payam, the top 3 scenarios are much easier to digest than 101
> use cases. Now we need to see how this use case relates to deliverables and
> requirements.
>
> It seems to me the smart city use cases are mainly about best practices
> and sensors.
>
> An important requirement seems to be linkability
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Linkability>.
> The first scenario even requires real time linkability. For (near) real
> time sensor data there is the dynamic sensor data
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DynamicSensorData>
> requirement.
>
> Could there be requirements in this use case that we have not discovered
> yet?
>
> @Alejandro: the dynamic sensor data
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DynamicSensorData> requirement
> seems to have two components: (near) real time data and streamable data.
> The streamable part is covered by the streamable data
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#Streamable>
> requirement. Shall we change the label to something like '(near) real time
> data'? Of course, as ever we also need to ask ourselves if the requirements
> are in scope. The streamable data requirement could be considered in scope
> because spatial objects can have a high volume. But is there something
> spatial about real time data access? If there is. I think we should make it
> clear in the description of the requirement.
>
> Regards,
> Frans
>
> 2015-05-27 1:06 GMT+02:00 Payam Barnaghi <payam.barnaghi@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Kerry, Alejandro and Frans,
>>
>> I updated the 101 use-cases and added narratives from the top 3 ranked
>> scenarios. I can edit and add a few more narratives if you think this needs
>> to be extended further.
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#.22101.22_Smart_City_Use-cases
>>
>> Please let me know if you want me add any further information to this
>> section.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Payam
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:48 PM, <Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au> wrote:
>>
>>>  Summary of 101 use cases before the Wednesday meeting? Otherwise it
>>> will miss out on the “first public working draft” of the ucr document. If
>>> you could put it on the wiki, and tell me and use case editors (cc’d) then
>>>  I think we can use it.
>>>
>>> I am keen because I want to make sure that we have a clear IoT  target.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kerry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Dr Kerry Taylor*
>>>
>>> *Principal  Research Scientist*
>>>
>>> Digital Productivity, CSIRO
>>>
>>> Adjunct Professor, ANU; Principal Fellow, University of  Melbourne;
>>> Visiting Reader, University of Surrey, UK
>>>
>>>  E: Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au or  Kerry.Taylor@acm.org  T: +61 2 6216 7038
>>> S: kerryleataylor
>>>
>>> Post: CSIRO Digital Productivity Flagship, GPO Box 664, Canberra ACT
>>> 2601, Australia
>>>
>>> Street:  Computer Science & Information Technology (Building 108),
>>> Australian National University, North Road, Acton ACT, Australia
>>>
>>> www.csiro.au
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Frans Knibbe
> Geodan
> President Kennedylaan 1
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
> www.geodan.nl
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>


-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>