Re: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC

Hi Josh,

Are we on schedule to organise a DWG call to vote next week ?

Ed


On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 01:59 Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
wrote:

> I believe the TC already agreed in Boulder to proceed to an e-vote for
> this and other discussion papers recommended for release by working groups
> subsequent to the Boulder meeting. As noted by Simon, we’ll have a
> Geosemantics DWG call to to vote on this recommendation and then ask for
> the vote. Three weeks begins from the first posted document, not the final
> one, so the e-vote can commence in a couple of weeks.
>
> Josh
>
> > On Jun 15, 2015, at 8:52 PM, simon.cox@csiro.au wrote:
> >
> >> From a W3C perspective, the document at [2] is now ready to go. The
> resolution to publish is recorded at [3] and there's a process that I'll
> take it through from now on, including getting approval for the short URL
> (sdw-ucr).
> >
> > I believe the next step on OGC side is for the (co-)chair to convene a
> (virtual) meeting of the Geosemantics DWG, to consider recommending release
> of the document as an OGC Discussion Paper.
> >
> >> My understanding is that *this* version is the one that now needs to go
> to the OGC process for publication that I believe Josh is leading. So the
> three week voting period will begin later this week.
> >
> > The common process with Discussion Papers that have come up from a DWG
> and therefore have been vetted there, but which do *not* bind OGC to
> anything, is to ask if there are any objections to publication. The
> Technical Committee Chair (TCC) has some prerogative on how to manage this.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
> > Sent: Monday, 15 June 2015 11:16 PM
> > To: Denise McKenzie; Joshua Lieberman
> > Cc: SDW WG Public List; Frans Knibbe | Geodan; Alejandro Llaves; Cox,
> Simon (L&W, Highett); Linda van den Brink; Ingo Simonis
> > Subject: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC
> >
> > Denise, Josh,
> >
> > As you know, there has been really good progress with the UCR doc
> recently. Following our discussions over the last two weeks, interaction
> with Simon and Denise, Jeremy's work to create the snapshot etc. I have
> made a couple of very minor changes to two docs in the GH repo.
> >
> > 1. The index page at [1] now properly mentions OGC! To prove this, I
> added the two logos.
> >
> > 2. The UCR snapshot [2] now includes the OGC document number and
> sentence within the Status section discussed with Simon during the Boulder
> TC. I have not made any other changes so it's as the editor's left it.
> >
> > From a W3C perspective, the document at [2] is now ready to go. The
> resolution to publish is recorded at [3] and there's a process that I'll
> take it through from now on, including getting approval for the short URL
> (sdw-ucr).
> >
> > My understanding is that *this* version is the one that now needs to go
> to the OGC process for publication that I believe Josh is leading. So the
> three week voting period will begin later this week.
> >
> > From my POV this is now 'over to you.' I'd be grateful if you could let
> me know, when you know, what the publication date is likely to be. For
> purely operational reasons, we only publish on Tuesdays and Thursdays and
> that will be the date embedded in the long URL (i.e.
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-sdw-ucr-yyymmdd/).
> >
> > Hope this is all in line with OGC expectations,
> >
> > Phil.
> >
> >
> > [1] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/
> > [2]
> >
> http://w3c.github.io/sdw/publishing-snapshots/FPWD-2015-06-11-UseCases/Overview.html
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2015/06/03-sdw-minutes#res2
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Phil Archer
> > W3C Data Activity Lead
> > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> >
> > http://philarcher.org
> > +44 (0)7887 767755
> > @philarcher1
>
>
>
> --

Ed Parsons
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Mobile +44 (0)7825 382263
www.edparsons.com @edparsons