W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2015

RE: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:52:28 +0000
To: <phila@w3.org>, <dmckenzie@opengeospatial.org>, <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
CC: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, <allaves@fi.upm.es>, <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, <isimonis@opengeospatial.org>
Message-ID: <2A7346E8D9F62D4CA8D78387173A054A60228818@exmbx04-cdc.nexus.csiro.au>
> From a W3C perspective, the document at [2] is now ready to go. The resolution to publish is recorded at [3] and there's a process that I'll take it through from now on, including getting approval for the short URL (sdw-ucr).

I believe the next step on OGC side is for the (co-)chair to convene a (virtual) meeting of the Geosemantics DWG, to consider recommending release of the document as an OGC Discussion Paper. 

> My understanding is that *this* version is the one that now needs to go to the OGC process for publication that I believe Josh is leading. So the three week voting period will begin later this week.

The common process with Discussion Papers that have come up from a DWG and therefore have been vetted there, but which do *not* bind OGC to anything, is to ask if there are any objections to publication. The Technical Committee Chair (TCC) has some prerogative on how to manage this. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2015 11:16 PM
To: Denise McKenzie; Joshua Lieberman
Cc: SDW WG Public List; Frans Knibbe | Geodan; Alejandro Llaves; Cox, Simon (L&W, Highett); Linda van den Brink; Ingo Simonis
Subject: Minor additions to GH Repo, over to OGC

Denise, Josh,

As you know, there has been really good progress with the UCR doc recently. Following our discussions over the last two weeks, interaction with Simon and Denise, Jeremy's work to create the snapshot etc. I have made a couple of very minor changes to two docs in the GH repo.

1. The index page at [1] now properly mentions OGC! To prove this, I added the two logos.

2. The UCR snapshot [2] now includes the OGC document number and sentence within the Status section discussed with Simon during the Boulder TC. I have not made any other changes so it's as the editor's left it.

 From a W3C perspective, the document at [2] is now ready to go. The resolution to publish is recorded at [3] and there's a process that I'll take it through from now on, including getting approval for the short URL (sdw-ucr).

My understanding is that *this* version is the one that now needs to go to the OGC process for publication that I believe Josh is leading. So the three week voting period will begin later this week.

 From my POV this is now 'over to you.' I'd be grateful if you could let me know, when you know, what the publication date is likely to be. For purely operational reasons, we only publish on Tuesdays and Thursdays and that will be the date embedded in the long URL (i.e. 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-sdw-ucr-yyymmdd/).

Hope this is all in line with OGC expectations,

Phil.


[1] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/

[2]
http://w3c.github.io/sdw/publishing-snapshots/FPWD-2015-06-11-UseCases/Overview.html

[3] http://www.w3.org/2015/06/03-sdw-minutes#res2


-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/


http://philarcher.org

+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 00:53:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:17 UTC