- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:44:21 +0200
- To: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz43_q8V0dKBbbDkRW8jyECsxY70vKHoLH28=gxNA3-fewQ@mail.gmail.com>
For the record: We have just decided in the weekly meeting that candidate requirements should be added as UCR issues to the tracker, but do need need to be added to the UCR document. Regards, Frans 2015-06-05 15:55 GMT+02:00 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>: > Hi Alejandro, > > We have decided to focus on linking ongoing debates to the UCR document > rather than trying to solve them. We will do this by defining issues in the > tracker and adding the issue URIs to the UCR document in a standardized > way. > > For issues with existing requirements it is clear where the link to the > issue should be placed: somewhere in the description of the requirement (at > the end, I would suggest). > > But how do we link to issues about requirements that could be added to the > UCR document but are not there yet? Or requirements that have been removed? > > One way of handling that could be to create a temporary new chapter with > 'candidate requirments' that await further discussion. > > Regards, > Frans > > -- > Frans Knibbe > Geodan > President Kennedylaan 1 > 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) > > T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 > E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl > www.geodan.nl > disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> > > -- Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 14:44:50 UTC