Re: Resolving UCR issues

Hi Frans,

Thanks for the reminder - I have sent the relevant request to the 
systems team to set up the automatic e-mail notification when new issues 
and actions are raised.

Phil

On 23/06/2015 10:13, Frans Knibbe wrote:
> 2015-06-23 10:32 GMT+02:00 Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>:
>
>> Yes, this is a good idea. There are also "raised" (pending) issues related
>> to the UCR document and to me it is not clear which is the right procedure
>> to fix them.
>>
>
> I don't think there is an official procedure. What I would like to suggest
> (and have been doing) is:
>
>     1. Raise an issue.
>     2. Make sure there is at least one associated e-mail thread (Phil
>     mentioned that should happen automatically but so far that has not happened
>     in our case).
>     3. Debate the issue in the e-mail list.
>     4. Once the debate seems to be finished propose a solution and change
>     the status of the issue to 'pending review'.
>     5. Make a final decision. For instance, accept the proposed solution in
>     a meeting.
>
> If we could keep up a rate of resolving one issue each week we should have
> an issue-free document this year :-)
>
> Saludos,
> Frans
>
>
>
>> Cheers,
>> Alejandro
>>
>> On 22 June 2015 at 21:46, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ed,
>>>
>>> At the moment three UCR issues have the status 'pending review'. Of
>>> those, I think ISSUE-10 <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/10>
>>> seems a good one to try to resolve.
>>>
>>> I don't know how long it will take to reach agreement. Perhaps it will
>>> help if resolving a particular issue is a separate agenda item. That should
>>> allow people to read up on the subject beforehand and to raise any problems
>>> with the proposed solution in the e-mail list. Ideally there will be no
>>> need for further discussion in the meeting and we can just have the vote.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Frans
>>>
>>> 2015-06-22 20:38 GMT+02:00 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello Frans,
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a specific issue in mind, and some idea as to how long we
>>>> will need to discuss. Kerry is putting this weeks agenda together tomorrow..
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 at 17:43 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Ed, Kerry,
>>>>>
>>>>> We still have some unresolved UCR issues. I believe it was Kerry who
>>>>> suggested that we might  use the weekly teleconference to try to resolve
>>>>> one selected issue. Do you think there is time for that in the next
>>>>> meetings? If so, then I suggest we start with issues that relate to Best
>>>>> Practices because that is our next deliverable. Or we could have one of the
>>>>> UCR editors suggest an issue, and perhaps also do a bit of preparation of
>>>>> the issue to facilitate decision making.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Frans
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Frans Knibbe
>>>>> Geodan
>>>>> President Kennedylaan 1
>>>>> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>>>>>
>>>>> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>>>>> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>>>>> www.geodan.nl
>>>>> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Ed Parsons
>>>> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>>>>
>>>> Mobile +44 (0)7825 382263
>>>> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Frans Knibbe
>>> Geodan
>>> President Kennedylaan 1
>>> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>>>
>>> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>>> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>>> www.geodan.nl
>>> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro Llaves
>>
>> Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
>>
>> Artificial Intelligence Department
>>
>> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>>
>> Avda. Montepríncipe s/n
>>
>> Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain
>>
>>
>> http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves
>>
>>
>> allaves@fi.upm.es
>>
>
>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2015 09:56:21 UTC