Re: Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage

Yes, there is an existing practice in the realm of current OGC standards.
But does this automatically mean there is a best practice for spatial data
on the web? In this example, the web developer would have to parse XML and
understand GML. That would not have the average web developer jumping for
joy. Considering that we want to advocate best practices that are as simple
as possible, and easy to adopt for developers that know little of
geospatial data, I think we could try to think of something more webby.

Also it does not feel right to me to ignore an applicable Dublin Core
metadata element (dcterms:spatial) when it is there to use.

Of course, if a recommended best practice also closely matches existing
geospatial standards that would be all the better.

Greetings,
Frans

2015-06-17 12:41 GMT+02:00 Peter Baumann <p.baumann@jacobs-university.de>:

>  indeed, confirming this (Frans, you already had a feeling in that
> direction): the envelope defines a bounding box whose coordinates are
> expressed in the CRS also referenced in the envelope. Here is a simple OGC
> coverage example (in XML, but easy to translate into RDF, JSON, etc), just
> FYI:
>
> <gml:Envelope srsName=" http://www.opengis.net/def/EPSG/0/4326“
>             axisLabels="Lat Long" uomLabels="deg deg" srsDimension=“2">
>             <gml:lowerCorner>1 2</gml:lowerCorner>
>             <gml:upperCorner>3 4</gml:upperCorner>
> </gml:Envelope>
>
> -Peter
>
>
> On 06/17/15 12:09, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
>
> Frans -
> You really don't have to make this up afresh.
> ISO 19107 defines a property 'envelope' for any geometry, with a value of
> type GM_Envelope, which has a lower and upper corner, whose values are
> points.
> ISO 19123 defines a property 'domain extent' for any coverage, with a
> value of type EX_Extent, which is a bit more complex (defined in ISO
> 19115).
> There is no standard property for the corresponding thing for a generic
> feature, but 'bounding box' is a common name.
>
> Simon
>
> Caveat lector - Sent from a tablet using TouchDown
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Frans Knibbe
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 17 June 2015 9:53:42 AM
> *To:* SDW WG Public List
> *Subject:* Best Practice for encoding spatial coverage
>
>  Hello all,
>
>  Is it OK to try to venture in to the domain of best practices already? I
> wonder if we can try our hands at the following issue:
>
>  I have just had a talk with a web developer on the best way of making
> the extent of a spatial data set known, in a Linked Data context. It is
> useful to know the spatial extent of a data set because that way a map can
> be zoomed in on the right patch of Earth.
>
>  I think an obvious predicate for making the extent known is
> dcterms:spatial
> <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-spatial> (Spatial
> Coverage). That should point to a dcterms:Location
> <http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#terms-Location>,
> which can have a geometry. So an option would be to encode the extent as a
> WKT polygon, according to GeoSPARQL semantics. But that would not be the
> most webdeveloper-friendly way of making the extent known.  The usual way
> of setting a map extent involves knowing the minimum and maximum values for
> X and Y. So a question is: what would be the best way to publish the
> minimum and maximum X and Y? There are usable vocabularies for publishing
> point coordinates, so one could think of recommending to publish two points
> (lower left corner and upper right corner). Perhaps there are standard
> vocabularies available that define the concepts of 'minimum' and 'maximum'
> and 'x' and 'y'?
>
>  I should note that this issue relates to the Spatial metadata requirement
> <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialMetadata>
> .
>
>
>  Greetings,
> Frans
>
>
>
>  --
>  Frans Knibbe
>  Geodan
> President Kennedylaan 1
> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>
>  T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
> www.geodan.nl
> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Baumann
>  - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
>    www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
>    mail: p.baumann@jacobs-university.de
>    tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
>  - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
>    www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann@rasdaman.com
>    tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
> "Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)
>
>
>
>


-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>