Re: Resolving UCR issues

2015-06-23 10:32 GMT+02:00 Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>:

> Yes, this is a good idea. There are also "raised" (pending) issues related
> to the UCR document and to me it is not clear which is the right procedure
> to fix them.
>

I don't think there is an official procedure. What I would like to suggest
(and have been doing) is:

   1. Raise an issue.
   2. Make sure there is at least one associated e-mail thread (Phil
   mentioned that should happen automatically but so far that has not happened
   in our case).
   3. Debate the issue in the e-mail list.
   4. Once the debate seems to be finished propose a solution and change
   the status of the issue to 'pending review'.
   5. Make a final decision. For instance, accept the proposed solution in
   a meeting.

If we could keep up a rate of resolving one issue each week we should have
an issue-free document this year :-)

Saludos,
Frans



> Cheers,
> Alejandro
>
> On 22 June 2015 at 21:46, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hello Ed,
>>
>> At the moment three UCR issues have the status 'pending review'. Of
>> those, I think ISSUE-10 <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/10>
>> seems a good one to try to resolve.
>>
>> I don't know how long it will take to reach agreement. Perhaps it will
>> help if resolving a particular issue is a separate agenda item. That should
>> allow people to read up on the subject beforehand and to raise any problems
>> with the proposed solution in the e-mail list. Ideally there will be no
>> need for further discussion in the meeting and we can just have the vote.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Frans
>>
>> 2015-06-22 20:38 GMT+02:00 Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>:
>>
>>> Hello Frans,
>>>
>>> Do you have a specific issue in mind, and some idea as to how long we
>>> will need to discuss. Kerry is putting this weeks agenda together tomorrow..
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 at 17:43 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Ed, Kerry,
>>>>
>>>> We still have some unresolved UCR issues. I believe it was Kerry who
>>>> suggested that we might  use the weekly teleconference to try to resolve
>>>> one selected issue. Do you think there is time for that in the next
>>>> meetings? If so, then I suggest we start with issues that relate to Best
>>>> Practices because that is our next deliverable. Or we could have one of the
>>>> UCR editors suggest an issue, and perhaps also do a bit of preparation of
>>>> the issue to facilitate decision making.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Frans
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Frans Knibbe
>>>> Geodan
>>>> President Kennedylaan 1
>>>> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>>>>
>>>> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>>>> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>>>> www.geodan.nl
>>>> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>
>>> Ed Parsons
>>> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>>>
>>> Mobile +44 (0)7825 382263
>>> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Frans Knibbe
>> Geodan
>> President Kennedylaan 1
>> 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
>>
>> T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
>> E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
>> www.geodan.nl
>> disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro Llaves
>
> Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
>
> Artificial Intelligence Department
>
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>
> Avda. Montepríncipe s/n
>
> Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain
>
>
> http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves
>
>
> allaves@fi.upm.es
>



-- 
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl
disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>