ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2008 by author

Adrien de Croy

• Re: Basic auth and realms (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: Basic auth and realms (Monday, 16 June)
• Basic auth and realms (Sunday, 15 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Thursday, 5 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy (Wednesday, 2 April)

Alex Rousskov

• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Thursday, 10 April)

Alexey Melnikov

• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Thursday, 22 May)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 6 May)

Antoin Verschuren

• RE: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• RE: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman

• OpenPGP for HTTP (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)

bert hubert

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Bill de hOra

• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Basic auth and realms (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: Basic auth and realms (Sunday, 15 June)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Wednesday, 7 May)

Brian McBarron

• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)

Brian Smith

• RE: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• RE: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• RE: combining ranges (Friday, 30 May)
• RE: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Thursday, 29 May)
• RE: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Problem with q values in Accept-Language (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Problem with q values in Accept-Language (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Monday, 5 May)
• RE: ETags and concurrency control (Thursday, 1 May)
• RE: ETags and concurrency control (Thursday, 1 May)
• Content-Location issues (was RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)
• RE: ETags and concurrency control (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: Proposal for i111 / i63 (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Monday, 7 April)

Charles Fry

• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Thursday, 3 April)

Chris Richard

• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)

Dan Connolly

• bug in default base URI in "HTTP Header Linking"? (Thursday, 19 June)

Dan Winship

• Re: Implied LWS questions (Friday, 6 June)

David Morris

• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Sunday, 6 April)

Debbie Garside

• RE: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)

Doug Moore

• ranges and chunked encoding (Saturday, 24 May)
• combining ranges (Saturday, 24 May)

Dra. Roberta Rosental

• Isto pode salvar sua vida.... nao deixe de ler.....hdrwqw (Monday, 12 May)

Elmar K. Bins

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Eric Brunner-Williams

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Florian Weimer

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)

Frank Ellermann

• Re: Issue 72 (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: relation registry (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: relation registry (Friday, 20 June)
• relation registry (was: bug in default base URI in "HTTP Header Linking"?) (Thursday, 19 June)
• Re: i59 (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: i59 (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: i59 (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: i59 (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Implied LWS questions (Friday, 6 June)
• Re: Implied LWS questions (Friday, 6 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Content-Disposition (was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, [...]) (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: Basic Authentication and encoding of non-ASCII characters in credentials (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Struggling with LWS (2616) vs LWSP (2831bis) (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Struggling with LWS (2616) vs LWSP (2831bis) (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: Likely OT: "closing the connection" (Thursday, 15 May)
• Likely OT: "closing the connection" (was: i28 proposed replacement text) (Thursday, 15 May)
• #67 (was: HTTPBis Summary) (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Proposal for i111 / i63 (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• OT: dream (was: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: i94, was: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: i94, was: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Thursday, 3 April)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: Implied LWS questions (Friday, 6 June)
• Re: Implicit *LWS (Monday, 7 April)
• Implicit *LWS (Monday, 7 April)

Gervase Markham

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Henrik Nordstrom

• Re: The "unsafe" charset (Saturday, 28 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Implied LWS questions (Sunday, 8 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Thursday, 5 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Thursday, 5 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• RE: 100-continue implementation status question (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Resolve issue 98? (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Basic Authentication and encoding of non-ASCII characters in credentials (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Struggling with LWS (2616) vs LWSP (2831bis) (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: Likely OT: "closing the connection" (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: Likely OT: "closing the connection" (was: i28 proposed replacement text) (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• RE: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Content-Location issues (was RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Implicit *LWS (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: i67: quoting charsets (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Tuesday, 1 April)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-03.txt (Tuesday, 17 June)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-03.txt (Tuesday, 17 June)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-03.txt (Tuesday, 17 June)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-03.txt (Tuesday, 17 June)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-03.txt (Tuesday, 17 June)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-03.txt (Tuesday, 17 June)
• I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-03.txt (Tuesday, 17 June)

J Ross Nicoll

• Re: Content Disposition (Thursday, 5 June)
• Re: Basic Authentication (Thursday, 5 June)

Jamie Lokier

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Thursday, 3 April)

Javier Godoy

• Re: default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Monday, 19 May)
• default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Wednesday, 7 May)

Jeroen Massar

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Joe Orton

• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Friday, 23 May)

John Kemp

• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)

Jonathan Rees

• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt - problem with default relationship base URI (Friday, 30 May)
• draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt - problem with default relationship base URI (Friday, 30 May)

Josh Cohen (MIG)

• RE: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy (Tuesday, 1 April)

Julian Reschke

• Re: The "unsafe" charset (Saturday, 28 June)
• Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Issue 121 (RFC 1806 vs RFC2183), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: relation registry (Friday, 20 June)
• Content-Disposition (new issue?) (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: relation registry (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: bug in default base URI in "HTTP Header Linking"? (Thursday, 19 June)
• New drafts published (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: repeating non-list-type-headers (Monday, 16 June)
• Re: planning publication of -03 drafts (Saturday, 14 June)
• planning publication of -03 drafts (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Thursday, 12 June)
• Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: i59 (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: i59 (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: i59 (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: i59 (Monday, 9 June)
• i59, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Monday, 9 June)
• Issue 40, Re: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Implied LWS questions (Friday, 6 June)
• Re: Implied LWS questions (Friday, 6 June)
• Implied LWS questions (Friday, 6 June)
• Re: Content Disposition (Friday, 6 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: Content-Disposition (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: Resolve issue 98? (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: 100-continue implementation status question (Sunday, 1 June)
• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt - problem with default relationship base URI (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt - problem with default relationship base URI (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Friday, 30 May)
• Resolve issue 98? (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Basic Authentication and encoding of non-ASCII characters in credentials (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Basic Authentication and encoding of non-ASCII characters in credentials (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Basic Authentication and encoding of non-ASCII characters in credentials (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Struggling with LWS (2616) vs LWSP (2831bis) (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Struggling with LWS (2616) vs LWSP (2831bis) (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Friday, 23 May)
• ABNF switch: list rules (Thursday, 22 May)
• Re: default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 6 May)
• XMLHttpRequest (XHR) in W3C Last Call (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Monday, 5 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Monday, 5 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Monday, 5 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: 100-continue implementation status question (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: Proposal for i111 / i63 (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Proposal for i70: cacheability of status 303 (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Proposal for i70: cacheability of status 303 (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: i67: quoting charsets (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: PUT: store "under" vs. "at", was: [ietf-http-wg] <none> (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 9 April)
• PUT: store "under" vs. "at", was: [ietf-http-wg] <none> (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Thursday, 3 April)
• Deploying new expectation-extensions (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: i94, was: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? (Thursday, 3 April)
• i39, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Thursday, 3 April)
• i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Thursday, 3 April)
• i94, was: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Proposal for i70: cacheability of status 303 (Thursday, 3 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: cacheability of status 303 (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i76 Use Proxy (Tuesday, 1 April)

Larry Masinter

• RE: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Thursday, 26 June)

Lisa Dusseault

• Re: i59 (Monday, 9 June)
• Resumption of upload (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Tuesday, 1 April)

Mark Baker

• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)

Mark Davis

• Re: Problem with q values in Accept-Language (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Problem with q values in Accept-Language (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)

Mark Nottingham

• Dublin meeting timeslot (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List - Please move discussion to dnsop (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Resolve issue 98? (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: 100-continue implementation status question (Monday, 2 June)
• Fwd: httpbis - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 72 (Tuesday, 27 May)
• HTTPBis Summary (Monday, 26 May)
• i28 - revised proposal (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: #23 Proposal (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Monday, 26 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Friday, 23 May)
• Fwd: httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 72 (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Sunday, 11 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Friday, 9 May)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-while-revalidate-01.txt (Friday, 9 May)
• Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Friday, 9 May)
• HTTPBis Summary (Friday, 9 May)
• Dublin meeting (Friday, 9 May)
• i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Friday, 9 May)
• #23 Proposal (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Friday, 9 May)
• [#116] ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 9 May)
• UA control of LM subrange cache-conditional requests (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)
• HTTPBis Summary (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal for i111 / i63 (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal for i70: cacheability of status 303 (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: PUT: store "under" vs. "at", was: [ietf-http-wg] <none> (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: HTTPBis Summary (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Proposal: i67 - quoting charsets (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Sunday, 6 April)
• Re: HTTPBis Summary (Friday, 4 April)
• i67: quoting charsets (Friday, 4 April)
• HTTPBis Summary (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: i39, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: i94, was: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? (Friday, 4 April)
• Proposal for i111 / i63 (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: i94, was: Does Reason-Phrase allow LWS? (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Thursday, 3 April)
• Updated Proposal: i24 Requiring Allow in 405 Responses (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Thursday, 3 April)
• Proposal for i70: cacheability of status 303 (Thursday, 3 April)
• Closing i41: Security Considerations (Thursday, 3 April)
• Proposal for i23: no-store invalidation (Thursday, 3 April)
• Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94 (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Wednesday, 2 April)

Martin Duerst

• Re: Basic Authentication and encoding of non-ASCII characters in credentials (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Wednesday, 7 May)
• default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: i67: quoting charsets (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Tuesday, 1 April)

Miles Crawford

• 401 Unauthenticated, 403 Unauthorized? (Thursday, 22 May)

Nicolas Alvarez

• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)

Pablo Castro

• RE: [#116] ETags and concurrency control (Sunday, 18 May)
• RE: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)

Patrick McManus

• Re: Upload negotiation (Tuesday, 8 April)

Patrik Fältström

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Paul Hoffman

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Paul Leach

• RE: 100-continue implementation status question (Friday, 25 April)
• 100-continue implementation status question (Friday, 25 April)

Per-Olav Gramstad

• SV: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Wednesday, 9 April)

Phil Archer

• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt (Tuesday, 29 April)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)

Pipian

• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)

Robert Brewer

• The "unsafe" charset (Saturday, 28 June)
• [ietf-http-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 8 April)

Robert Siemer

• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Thursday, 5 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Monday, 28 April)

Roberto Javier Godoy

• RE: Problem with q values in Accept-Language (Wednesday, 7 May)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i99 Pipelining Problems (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: i74: Encoding for non-ASCII headers (Thursday, 3 April)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-01.txt (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: i109: Clarify entity / representation / variant terminology (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: #23 Proposal (Friday, 9 May)

Stefanos Harhalakis

• Fwd: I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-03.txt (Saturday, 12 April)

Stephane Bortzmeyer

• Re: Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) (Tuesday, 15 April)

Story Henry

• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Sketch of a very simple identification protocol (Tuesday, 1 April)

Tim Olsen

• Re: 100-continue implementation status question (Saturday, 26 April)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: sketch of a simple authentication protocol (Thursday, 3 April)

Werner Baumann

• Re: 401 Unauthenticated, 403 Unauthorized? (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: ETags and concurrency control (Friday, 2 May)

Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List (Monday, 9 June)

Yves Lafon

• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Thursday, 5 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Thursday, 5 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Saturday, 10 May)
• Re: i28 proposed replacement text (Friday, 18 April)

Zed A. Shaw

• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ABNF switch: list rules (Saturday, 24 May)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 June 2008 23:20:01 UTC