Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
>  However relying on non-compliance of proxies in this case would be
> foolhardy.  Changing the semantics of Expects I don't think is that great an
> option either (actually I'd vote to deprecate it along with 305 Use Proxy)

+1

Mark.

Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 03:09:20 UTC