- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 03:41:42 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Mark Nottingham wrote: <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/10> > the following issues look like they can be handled by > the editors without input from the WG [...] > * i51 - HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date [...] > * i64 - WS in quoted-pair i51 + i64 look interesting, the latter mentions to use RFC 2822. When the editors tackle this I hope they check 2822upd, there are some subtle ABNF corrections, and 2822upd is very near to ready (behind PubReq). Frank
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 01:40:07 UTC