- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:13:48 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > Optimally, we'll just have to bump up the reference then, right? Almost certainly, yes. Just don't *copy* RFC 4646 syntax details. > I'm tempted to drop the statement, or even go further to drop > the example as well. An updated example would be nice. For readers not familar with new 4646-features it could get them to read RFC 4646, figure out what es-419 is, lookup man-Nkoo-GN, or simply see that az-Arab is something that wasn't possible before. Admittedly a case of RFC-spamvertizing, not necessary to get HTTP technically right. Frank
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2008 23:11:44 UTC