- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:23:19 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Am 10.05.2008 um 01:11 schrieb Mark Nottingham: > > Yeah. Anybody else want to weigh in pro or con on this? Well, apart from the obvious: stale-if-error: consistent naming with other cache control directives sie: saving 11 octets it comes down to the usual fight between good taste and efficiency, or? Java and C naming schemes, UNIX and Windows, BMW and Mercedes Benz, Mars and Venus. Some would say "stale-if-error" is more girlie and "sie" is a manly name. On the other hand, legend has it, that D. Ritchie, when asked what he would do different in UNIX, said: "Well, I would name it create() next time." Hell, if I know. Throw a dice. //Stefan -- <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 09:24:06 UTC