Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

• From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:39:39 +0200
• To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <fu5kg9$n0k$1@ger.gmane.org>

Debbie Garside wrote:

> Rather than re-inventing the wheel, why not just go
> with what is already written within RFC4646bis-12 

That's an idea if and after 4646bis was approved plus
eight weeks.  For now 2616bis drafts can reference
RFC 4646, all details are explained within RFC 4646.

That the "x" in x-pig-latin is no "primary subtag"
in RFC 4646 terminology isn't relevant for 2616bis,
and the example is a fair warning for implementors.

 Frank

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 19:37:31 UTC