- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:15:52 -0400
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <A46C2D9D-41B4-4F8B-B9F5-64DB1D8051E8@creativecommons.org>
Re http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt : Relationship values are URIs that identify the type of link. If the relationship is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html#", and the value MUST be present in the link relation registry. My understanding of the way that a relative URI gets combined with a base URI (RFC 2396 section 5.2) is that if you combine the above base URI with "next" you get http://www.iana.org/assignments/next not http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html#next and I think you intend the latter, not the former. Also, you might consider the possibility that the relations are backed by RDF/XML instead of or in addition to HTML. This is a detail but it could make a difference to RDF-aware applications. I don't know enough about IANA's taste to know whether this is feasible. Regards, Jonathan Rees Science Commons and W3C TAG
Received on Friday, 30 May 2008 15:16:36 UTC