- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:15:52 -0400
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <A46C2D9D-41B4-4F8B-B9F5-64DB1D8051E8@creativecommons.org>
Re http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt :
Relationship values are URIs that identify the type of link. If the
relationship is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be considered
to be
"http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html#", and the
value
MUST be present in the link relation registry.
My understanding of the way that a relative URI gets combined with a
base URI (RFC 2396 section 5.2) is that if you combine the above base
URI with "next" you get
http://www.iana.org/assignments/next
not
http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html#next
and I think you intend the latter, not the former.
Also, you might consider the possibility that the relations are
backed by RDF/XML instead of or in addition to HTML. This is a detail
but it could make a difference to RDF-aware applications. I don't
know enough about IANA's taste to know whether this is feasible.
Regards,
Jonathan Rees
Science Commons and W3C TAG
Received on Friday, 30 May 2008 15:16:36 UTC