- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:46:29 +0200
- To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Frank Ellermann wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: > >> should RFC2616bis adopt the LWSP production used in RFC5234? > > You can use it in a "MUST NOT generate, MUST accept" section > about obsolete syntax, same idea as obs-FWS in 2822 + 2822upd. > > The LWSP problem are "apparently empty lines" in the header. > > For mail and news the sound solution is FWS excluding obs-FWS, > folding is okay, but each folded line has to contain non-WSP > (= not only white space). Understood; but that's a separate discussion. For now, I'm just trying to make progress on the ABNF conversion; *not* on changing the allowed syntax (for which I think we don't have consensus yet). BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 09:47:16 UTC