- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:21:36 +0200
- To: Charles Fry <fry@google.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Brian McBarron <bpm@google.com>, google-gears-eng@googlegroups.com, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
lör 2008-04-05 klockan 10:37 -0400 skrev Charles Fry: > If you are correct, then that implies (as I understand it) that Expect > is the wrong mechanism for 100 continues, as the only requirement is > an end-to-end request and interim response, with no hop-by-hop > requirements. I am just trying to fully understand why an Expect would > be necessary for some 1xx responses and not others. It's correct as there is situations where it's known 100 Continue won't come (next-hop HTTP/1.0). For what it's worth it could have been spelled "Expect: HTTP/1.1". with the same effect. Regards Henrik
Received on Saturday, 5 April 2008 23:23:30 UTC