- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:32:33 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> B. Status Codes: <http://www.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/40>
>>
>> I have added instructions to update the status code registry in P2.
>>
>> Question:
>>
>> 3) The current status code registration procedure is hiding in a
>> really obscure place
>> (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2817#section-7.1>), should Part 2 take
>> over (me thinks yes). Should we keep the registration requirements
>> (IETF standards track)?
>
> Yes and yes.
> ...
Proposed patch:
<http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/59/i59.diff>.
This copies RFC2817's reg. procedure into P2, Section 5 ("Status Code
and Reason Phrase"), and updates the IANA Considerations and the Change
Log accordingly.
BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 16:33:18 UTC