- From: Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 19:19:02 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Robert Siemer <Robert.Siemer-httpwg@backsla.sh>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, "atom-protocol@imc.org" <atom-protocol@imc.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
This is now implemented in Astoria, so I guess we already have 1 working implementation of this nit in the spec :) More seriously, the effective/fast discussion and turn-around of this clarification was great. appreciated. -pablo -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:46 AM To: Henrik Nordstrom Cc: Mark Nottingham; Pablo Castro; Mark Baker; Robert Siemer; Brian Smith; atom-protocol@imc.org; HTTP Working Group Subject: Re: [#116] ETags and concurrency control Julian Reschke wrote: > OK. > > It seems this one is ready for closure. > > If there are no objections, I'll apply the change proposed in > <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/116/i116.diff> > tomorrow. > > BR, Julian Done with <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/245>. BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2008 02:19:48 UTC