- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 18:32:06 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Last call. Current proposal:
>
> ref: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i28
>
> In section 4.4 the current text is:
> <<<
> 2.If a Transfer-Encoding header field (section 14.41) is present and
> has any value other than "identity", then the transfer-length is
> defined by use of the "chunked" transfer-coding (section 3.6),
> unless the message is terminated by closing the connection.
>>>>
> Here is the porposed clarification text:
> <<<
> 2: If a Transfer-Encoding header field (Section 14.41) is present, and
> has any value other than "identity", then the transfer-length is
> defined by use of the "chunked" transfer-coding (Section 3.6)
>>>>
+1
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2008 22:32:38 UTC