Re: i28 proposed replacement text

On fre, 2008-05-23 at 14:30 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Changing things to refer explicitly to "chunked" may help;
> 
> 2. If the Transfer-Encoding header field (section 14.41) is present  
> and contains the "chunked" value, the transfer-length is defined by  
> the use of the "chunked" transfer encoding.
> 
> Note that 3.6 already requires that the chunked value be listed if  
> chunking is in use.
> 
> 3.6 would still benefit from:
> Whenever a transfer-coding is applied to a message-body, the set of  
> transfer-codings MUST include "chunked", unless the message indicates  
> it is terminated by closing the connection.


Looks fine to me.

Regards
Henrik