- From: Patrik Fältström <patrik@frobbit.se>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:56:56 +0000
- To: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
- Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 9 jun 2008, at 15.41, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Patrik Fältström wrote:
>> The problem with any such mechanisms is that the barrier of entry for
>> new players (that does not match the currently used list -- including
>> non-upgraded software) is increased. More than what people think.
>
> This isn't so. For TLDs not in the list, the usual rules (about e.g.
> cookie setting) would be applied. In other words, the situation is no
> different to what it is now. This information is additive.
What about new structures in a TLD that is in the list?
I.e. I do understand what you want to do, but am nervous still about
the result if the list is not updated. Yes, you say your software is
updated often, and sure, you might be the best in the class.
I just felt it was sort of my job to point out the risks, specifically
as the risks are written down.
What you at the end of the day do is of course up to you. ;-)
Patrik
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 16:54:17 UTC