- From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:11:12 +1200
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
or should the proxy always respond with the HTTP version number it received in a response? I know for upstream the proxy should alway set the protocol version to it's own, but downstream? Else there's no way a client can tell what the end server capabilities might be. Adrien de Croy wrote: > > > Adrien de Croy wrote: >>>> iii) praying that as a proxy we never get large chunked requests to >>>> process for upstream HTTP/1.0 agents. >>>> >>> >>> Proxies should respond with 411 in such case, making communication >>> revert to "HTTP/1.0 compatible" with all the problems that have.. >>> >>> >> >> I guess so, or at least to retry without chunking. I guess the 411 >> would come from the HTTP/1.0 server? How to tell that the server is >> HTTP/1.0 if it doesn't recognise Transfer-Encoding, and just sees >> chunk wrappers as part of the content anyway? Would it be purely >> lack of Content-Length? Or would you have to rely on cached knowledge? >> > > Just looked it up.. RFC1945 specifies that a server receiving a POST > without Content-Length (or if it cannot determine the length - dunno > how it could otherwise) SHOULD respond with a 400 (bad request). > There's no code specified in HTTP 1.0 for length required, so I guess > it comes down to a heuristic. > > If a proxy sends a chunked POST to a server, and that server responds > with HTTP/1.0 and 400 (but not 401, 403 or 404) then the response the > proxy should send to the client should be 411 Length required? > > Seems like a bit of an assumption, although the HTTP/1.0 is a bit of a > giveaway, but it's still possible the request was bounced for some > other reason, and will bounce again even if the client can and does > submit with Content-Length. > > Cheers > > Adrien > -- Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 13:10:25 UTC