- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:32:00 +1000
- To: Charles Fry <fry@google.com>
- Cc: "Alex Rousskov" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, google-gears-eng@googlegroups.com
Very hard to say; people differ widely about the deployment footprint of proxies, regardless of version. if you can get your hands on a popular Web site's access logs :), you could look at the Via header's contents, although some number of proxies will not append it (as previously discussed). I would point out that Squid is by far one of the more popular choices, especially in small ISPs, 2nd- and 3rd- world countries, etc., and it's still HTTP/1.0 (although 2.7 will have a HTTP/1.1 mode, and from the testing I've done, it's pretty conformant). Cheers, On 11/04/2008, at 10:21 AM, Charles Fry wrote: > We are interested in HTTP/1.0 proxies in addition to HTTP/1.1 proxies. > Speaking of which, does anybody have any statistics on the relative > distribution of such proxies in the wild? -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 00:33:03 UTC