- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 13:42:59 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > For now, I'm just trying to make progress on the ABNF conversion; > *not* on changing the allowed syntax (for which I think we don't > have consensus yet). Fine, for 2831bis I arrived at <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.sasl/2758> amended by <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.sasl/2759> using the definition LWSP = *(WSP / CRLF WSP) That's the same LWSP as in STD 68 with "apparently empty lines". To fix this *later* you can simply replace LWSP by FWS (RFC 2822): FWS = ([*WSP CRLF] 1*WSP) / obs-FWS *Later* put the "multi-CRLF" crap into <obs-FWS>, and say that it MUST NOT be generated, compare RFC 2822 chapter 4.2. The syntax for <obs-FWS> could be improved, I didn't see that in the 2822upd discussions: obs-FWS = 1*WSP *(CRLF 1*WSP) I think that should be obs-FWS = 1*WSP 2*(CRLF 1*WSP) or similar. Frank
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 11:42:16 UTC