W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: relation registry

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:53:14 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <g3g23b$ja3$1@ger.gmane.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hm, looking at 
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01>,
> I don't see "ifragment" mentioned anywhere...

It's in section 3.1:

| Relationship values are URIs that identify the type of link.  If
| the relationship is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be considered
| to be <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html#>, and
| the value MUST be present in the link relation registry.

Roughly anything after the first # in an IRI is a <ifragment>.  I
had RFC 4287 atom:link in mind, that talks about IRIs.  Mark's I-D
is for HTTP => URIs, I should have written <fragment>, sorry.

> Are you looking at something else...?

Yes, I'm talking about the IANA link relation registry, not about
the link relation syntax... :-) 

Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 10:52:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:36 UTC