- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:53:14 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > Hm, looking at > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01>, > I don't see "ifragment" mentioned anywhere... It's in section 3.1: | Relationship values are URIs that identify the type of link. If | the relationship is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be considered | to be <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html#>, and | the value MUST be present in the link relation registry. Roughly anything after the first # in an IRI is a <ifragment>. I had RFC 4287 atom:link in mind, that talks about IRIs. Mark's I-D is for HTTP => URIs, I should have written <fragment>, sorry. > Are you looking at something else...? Yes, I'm talking about the IANA link relation registry, not about the link relation syntax... :-) Frank
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 10:52:13 UTC