- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:53:38 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think a separate document to populate the registry is a good idea. > ... OK, so the current proposal would be to have: - the method registry inside Part2, modeled similarly to the status code registry (-> IETF review required), - the registration for methods defined in Part 2 inside Part 2 (IANA Considerations) - an additional document, referencing Part 2, and making the registrations for all other methods BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2008 13:54:21 UTC