- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:17:23 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I think this is editorial; Julian, can you create? On 09/04/2008, at 11:52 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Robert Brewer wrote: >> http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/browser/draft-ietf-httpbis/02 >> /draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-02.txt says: >> 8.6. PUT >> The PUT method requests that the enclosed entity be stored under >> the >> supplied Request-URI. >> RFC2616 says the same. I've run into several people now who thought >> "under" implied "at a subpath of the Request-URI" (yes, even though >> the >> following text clearly contradicts that). To reduce confusion, can we >> change "under" to "at"? > > Sounds good to me. > > BR, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 23:18:34 UTC