www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2004 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: Comments on WebArch (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: A scenario investigating questions of conformance and scoping (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• Issue #136 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Wednesday, 4 February)

Anne Thomas Manes

• Fwd: [wsdl] WSDL v2.0 Schema Error (Wednesday, 11 February)
• RE: Second level xs:import (Wednesday, 4 February)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Validation, Versioning and RDF [Was Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1] (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: Proposed resolution to issue 143 (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Proposed resolution to issue 143 (Thursday, 26 February)
• Dublin Core for Version metadata (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore (Thursday, 12 February)
• Message Reference, Message|element encore (Wednesday, 11 February)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Thursday, 26 February)

David Booth

• Validation, Versioning and RDF [Was Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1] (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments on WebArch (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments on WebArch (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments on WebArch (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Comments on WebArch (Thursday, 26 February)
• WSDL Language versus processor (Thursday, 26 February)
• Minutes of WS Desc teleconference 2004-02-05 (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: tinyurl considered harmful (Thursday, 5 February)

David Orchard

• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Saturday, 28 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: Comments on WebArch (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Friday, 20 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Versioning scenarios and compatibility assurances (Saturday, 14 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• Issue 109: Versioning (Thursday, 12 February)

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness

• re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Thursday, 19 February)

Fabien Gandon

• Post-Doc positions available at INRIA Sophia Antipolis (Friday, 13 February)

FABLET Youenn

• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore (Thursday, 19 February)

Glen Daniels

• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: operation name in responses? (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: operation name in responses? (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• Out Of Body Experiences (application header feature) (Thursday, 12 February)
• ISSUE : Properties should not be limited to simple types (Thursday, 5 February)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Thursday, 19 February)

Hugo Haas

• Re: Marking operations safe (Friday, 27 February)
• Marking operations safe (Friday, 27 February)
• Handling Privacy In WSDL 2.0 (Wednesday, 18 February)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: Comments on WebArch (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: operation name in responses? (Monday, 23 February)
• operation name in responses? (Monday, 23 February)
• My review of AWWW (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: A scenario investigating questions of conformance and scoping (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Message attribute optional (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Confusion between binding and element names (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features (Wednesday, 18 February)
• SOAP Data Model Schema Language (first public proposal) (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Should WSDL say anything about whitespace in SOAP:Body? (Monday, 16 February)
• Should WSDL say anything about whitespace in SOAP:Body? (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Thursday, 12 February)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Comments on WebArch (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: The semantics of mandatory properties and features (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE : Properties should not be limited to simple types (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Issues list and edtodo updated (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Another try at HTTP binding (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Declaring and Using Media Types and Pointer to Task Force Mailing List (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: tinyurl considered harmful (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: updates to edtodo? (Wednesday, 4 February)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• New Issue: wsdl location and service reference (Monday, 1 March)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)

Jim Murphy

• Re: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Monday, 23 February)

Jim Webber

• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Saturday, 21 February)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) (Saturday, 28 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 27 February)
• [revised] Agenda: 4-5 March 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Friday, 27 February)
• Minutes, 26 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Comments on WebArch (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [draft] Agenda: 4-5 March 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [rev] Agenda, 26 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Minutes: 19 February 2004 WS Description WG telcon (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Comments on WebArch (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Agenda, 26 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: Comments on WebArch (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Comments on WebArch (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Saturday, 21 February)
• [rev 1] Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Monday, 16 February)
• Minutes, 12 Feb 2004 WS Description telcon (Friday, 13 February)
• Minutes, 22 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 12 February)
• RE: Agenda, 12 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 12 February)
• Agenda, 12 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Monday, 9 February)
• RE: Declaring and Using Media Types and Pointer to Task Force Mailing List (Monday, 9 February)
• RE: Issues list and edtodo updated (Monday, 9 February)
• Agenda, 5 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: tinyurl considered harmful (Thursday, 5 February)
• Summary: 28-30 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Minutes: 29 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Minutes: 30 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Minutes: 28 Jan 2004 WS Description FTF (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: updates to edtodo? (Tuesday, 3 February)

Mark Baker

• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Comments on WebArch (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Comments on WebArch (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Message Reference, Message|element encore (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Thursday, 19 February)
• Operation names and self-description (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: WSDL WG request for adding multiple version extensibility into Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: tinyurl considered harmful (Wednesday, 4 February)
• tinyurl considered harmful (Wednesday, 4 February)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Friday, 27 February)
• RE: Proposed resolution to issue 143 (Thursday, 26 February)
• Proposed resolution to issue 143 (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• RE: [wsdl] WSDL v2.0 Schema Error (Wednesday, 11 February)
• RE: Second level xs:import (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: Second level xs:import (Wednesday, 4 February)

Matthew Fuchs

• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Saturday, 21 February)
• RE: WSD WG requests to XML Schema WG (Friday, 20 February)

Michael Champion

• Re: Marking operations safe (Friday, 27 February)

Paul Denning

• Re: Marking operations safe (Friday, 27 February)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Dublin Core for Version metadata (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Comments on WebArch (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 20 February)
• RE: Message Reference, Message|element encore (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: Issue: should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* in the message? (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 5 February)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed (Wednesday, 4 February)

rdc@mitre.org

• Invitation for paper submission (Friday, 6 February)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: updates to edtodo? (Monday, 2 February)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) (Saturday, 28 February)
• question about interface/operation/@style and interface/@styleDefault (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Message attribute optional (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: Agenda, 19 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Should WSDL say anything about whitespace in SOAP:Body? (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Second level xs:import (Thursday, 5 February)
• updates to edtodo? (Monday, 2 February)

Savas Parastatidis

• RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)

Tom Jordahl

• RE: Message attribute optional (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)
• Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)

Ugo Corda

• Endpoints and QNames (Thursday, 26 February)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Re: Action item 2003-11-03 OperationName feature (Thursday, 26 February)
• Correction for the f2f Minutes (Also action 2004-01-30 for Jonathan) (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Monday, 23 February)
• 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Agenda, 12 February 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: ISSUE : Properties should not be limited to simple types (Thursday, 5 February)
• Declaring and Using Media Types and Pointer to Task Force Mailing List (Thursday, 5 February)

Vambenepe, William N

• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 20 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 19 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Friday, 13 February)
• RE: Version attribute for WSDL (Thursday, 12 February)

WI/IAT'04 (IEEE/WIC/ACM)

• WI/IAT'04 On-Line Submission is open (Wednesday, 18 February)

Yaron Goland

• Invitation for a Discussion on Headers (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: Second level xs:import (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: Second level xs:import (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Headers as first class citizens (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: Second level xs:import (Tuesday, 3 February)

Last message date: Sunday, 29 February 2004 20:53:22 UTC