- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 01:37:15 -0500
- To: dorchard@bea.com
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
In-Reply-To=<32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF057F63F3@ussjex01.amer.bea.com> References=<32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF057F63F3@ussjex01.amer.bea.com> > > > > 3.3.1: "Note that one can use a URI with a fragment identifier even if > > one does not have a representation available for interpreting the > > fragment identifier (one can compare two such URIs, for example). > > Parties that draw conclusions about the interpretation of a fragment > > identifier without retrieving a representation do so at their > > own risk; > > such interpretations are not authoritative." > > > > This seems to imply that you can compare component > > designators, but you > > can't safely crack the URI and infer (for example) the type > > of component > > from it. Do we need to say anything about that? > > > > argh. I think you CAN crack the URI IFF the WSDL spec defines how it uses them. I don't think so, at least not unless WSDL defines its own URI scheme. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 01:36:39 UTC