W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Comments on WebArch

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 01:37:15 -0500
To: dorchard@bea.com
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040224013715.F25269@www.markbaker.ca>

In-Reply-To=<32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF057F63F3@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>
References=<32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF057F63F3@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>

> > 
> > 3.3.1: "Note that one can use a URI with a fragment identifier even if
> > one does not have a representation available for interpreting the
> > fragment identifier (one can compare two such URIs, for example).
> > Parties that draw conclusions about the interpretation of a fragment
> > identifier without retrieving a representation do so at their 
> > own risk;
> > such interpretations are not authoritative."
> > 
> > This seems to imply that you can compare component 
> > designators, but you
> > can't safely crack the URI and infer (for example) the type 
> > of component
> > from it.  Do we need to say anything about that?
> > 
> 
> argh.  I think you CAN crack the URI IFF the WSDL spec defines how it uses them.

I don't think so, at least not unless WSDL defines its own URI scheme.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 01:36:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:15:02 UTC