W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:42:05 -0000
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CD364@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


Hey Glen:

> OK, let's start this way.  Why do we bother with <operation> 
> at all in WSDL?

If you remember a while back, Savas and I tried to get it changed to
something more meaningful like "messageExchange." 

All operation really defines is the structure of incoming/outgoing
messages for a specific interaction.

Jim

Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 16:43:08 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Webber: "RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"
Previous message: Jonathan Marsh: "RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"
Maybe in reply to: Umit Yalcinalp: "2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"
Next in thread: Jim Webber: "RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:42 GMT