W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

Issues list and edtodo updated

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:12:45 +0100
Message-ID: <40226B7D.301@crf.canon.fr>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org

Edtodo updated.
Issues list updated (new issues, issues closed, resolution added).

Can someone pls doublecheck?

JJ.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:

> Web Service Description Group
> Summary, FTF meeting 28-30 Jan 2004
> Bedford, hosted by Sonic.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Summary
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Wednesday:
> 
>  Testing:
>   RESOLUTION: we should have a separate document for test assertions 
>               and this document has to be explicitly linked to the 
>               spec.
>   ACTION: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for test suite.
>   RESOLUTION: Arthur is the Editor for this document.
> 
>  Issue 105 (Fault proposal):
>   RESOLUTION: Accept Paul's proposal to hoist faults in the interface.
>   RESOLUTION: Rename faultDefault to fault.
>   RESOLUTION: Allow <value>,<subcode> as children of 
>               <wsoap:fault[Default]>.
>   RESOLUTION: Remove per-operation (in|out)fault
>   NEW ISSUE:  Open issue on the name of wsoap:fault/@name and 
>               outfault/@name (should indicate that it is a reference, 
>               not defining a name)
>   ACTION: Sanjiva to consistify the @name attributes.
> 
>  Issue fault-name-uniqueness:
>   RESOLUTION: Close issue-fault-name-uniqueness - works just like 
>              operations (no change to spec).
> 
>  Issue 89:
>   RESOLUTION: Close issue 89 by changing the namespace of wsoap:fault 
>              to wsdl:fault, and add a corresponding component in the 
>              abstract model.
> 
>  Issue 87:
>   RESOLUTION: Close issue #87 with no action.
> 
>  Optional extensions:
>   No resolution.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Thursday:
> 
>  Attribute styles:
>   RESOLUTION: Remove attribute styles.
>   RESOLUTION: Close issue 103 as irrelevant since styles are removed.
> 
>  Features and Properties:
>   Insufficient interest to mark f&p "at risk".
>   New proposal for compositors discussed, decision deferred.
> 
>  Inline syntax [BEA proposal]:
>   Significant opposition to further pursuit of such a proposal.
>   Proposal for non-XML syntax withdrawn.
> 
>  Issue 102: Schema import.
>   RESOLUTION: Issue 102 closed with Glen's wording and with "root" 
>               changed to "importing".
> 
>  Header/Body style [BEA proposal]
>   Dependent upon Glen's generic header-adding feature, which is
>   still outstanding.
>   
>  Issue 79: How much validation?
>   ACTION:   David Booth to suggest improvements to the spec clarifying
>             "WSDL processor".]
>   New Issue: Is there something we can do to improve conformance on 
>              the wire between WSDL-based agents? This would prevent 
>              us from getting immediately profiled.]
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Friday:
> 
>  Versioning:
>   ACTION: DaveO to write up a proposal for augmenting schema 
>           information to enable versioned data.
>   ACTION: DavidO to write request to schema group to address the
>           issue of schema not supporting ignoring extended content.
>   ACTION: Tom to write proposal on version attribute (modeled after
>           schema's).
> 
>  Inheritance
>   ACTION: Umit to write a proposal on @wsdlLocation
>   RESOLUTION: Issue 76 closed as duplicate of 81.
>   RESOLUTION: Issue 81 closed without action, no compelling 
>         scenario and workaround exists.
> 
>  Issue 95: service/@name:
>   RESOLUTION: @name optional for the standalone service type use. it 
>               will be required inside the context of a wsdl document.
>               we may be able to describe in the schema as well as in 
>               the spec but we should check for side effect. Close
>               issue 95.
>   ACTION: Jonathan to investigate typo in last f2f meeting on 
>           _S_erviceType.
> 
>  Media type TF report (preliminary)
>   ACTION: Umit to forward a link/proposal on media types to the WG list
> 
>  Issue 104: Appendix E cleanup.
>   ACTION: Jonathan to add s/@message/@element/ on a teleconference 
>           agenda (proposal had general acclaim at meeting).
>   ACTION: Jonathan to add s/@messageReference/@label/ on a 
>           teleconference agenda (proposal had general acclaim at
>           meeting.)
>  
>  Issue 80: Inappropriate binding component name
>   RESOLUTION: Keep "binding", close issue 80 with no action.
> 
>  Issue 82: Relax binding syntax
>   RESOLUTION: given the changes to the syntax, we close issue 82 with no
>               action.
> 
>  Issue 83: Interaction between binding extensions
>   RESOLUTION: Issue 83 is closed with no action.
> 
>  ACTION: Issues list editor to retitle Issues 113 and 91.
> 
>  Issue 91: MEP terminology.
>   RESOLUTION: Issue 91 is closed, editors will use the term "Message
>             Exchange Pattern" rather than "Message Pattern".
> 
>  New (old) issue: Marking operations as 'safe' 
>   ACTION:  Philippe to draft a note for the group around safe 
>            operations.
>            
>  New (old) issue: "renaming the label of MEPs"
>   RESOLUTION: Change MEP labels from A and B to IN and OUT
> 
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2004 11:13:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:15:02 UTC