W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:49:11 -0500
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B27165AE1@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Hi Jim:

> > OK, let's start this way.  Why do we bother with 
> <operation> at all in 
> > WSDL?
> 
> If you remember a while back, Savas and I tried to get it 
> changed to something more meaningful like "messageExchange." 
> 
> All operation really defines is the structure of 
> incoming/outgoing messages for a specific interaction.
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Exactly.  See the other msgs in this thread for my take on
why it's important to have SOME way of recognizing which 
interaction is in play.

--Glen
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 16:57:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:15:02 UTC