W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:49:11 -0500
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B27165AE1@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Hi Jim:

> > OK, let's start this way.  Why do we bother with 
> <operation> at all in 
> > WSDL?
> If you remember a while back, Savas and I tried to get it 
> changed to something more meaningful like "messageExchange." 
> All operation really defines is the structure of 
> incoming/outgoing messages for a specific interaction.

Exactly.  See the other msgs in this thread for my take on
why it's important to have SOME way of recognizing which 
interaction is in play.

Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 16:57:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:47 UTC