W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:50:05 -0800
Message-ID: <403A677D.40101@oracle.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org



Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On Feb 23, 2004, at 2:54 PM, Umit Yalcinalp wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>  Given an interface there may be more than one exchange that uses the 
>> same message structure. When an endpoint receive a message, it is NOT 
>> obvious which message exchange it belongs to since the current WSDL 
>> design does not convey an identifier of the exchange in the exchange 
>> itself.
>
>
> Just trying to understand....Is this what you mean?
>
> I have operation Foo and Bar and they both have the same initial in 
> message (same type, etc.)? All the subsequent messages might be 
> distinguished by whatever correlation mechanism one has.
>
> Or do you mean that two message exchanges with the same pattern and 
> same types for all the messages (and the same 
> endpoint/binding/whatever) should nevertheless be distinguishable (by 
> "operation")?
>
> The former seems quite plausible. The latter seems to require actually 
> distinguishing the messages :)

Ah, I think I know where you are heading ;-). We are trying to solve the 
former, although the latter is also an interesting problem as well.

>
> Cheers,
> Bijan Parsia.

--umit

>
>

-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 15:51:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:15:02 UTC