- From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:50:05 -0800
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Bijan Parsia wrote: > On Feb 23, 2004, at 2:54 PM, Umit Yalcinalp wrote: > [snip] > >> Given an interface there may be more than one exchange that uses the >> same message structure. When an endpoint receive a message, it is NOT >> obvious which message exchange it belongs to since the current WSDL >> design does not convey an identifier of the exchange in the exchange >> itself. > > > Just trying to understand....Is this what you mean? > > I have operation Foo and Bar and they both have the same initial in > message (same type, etc.)? All the subsequent messages might be > distinguished by whatever correlation mechanism one has. > > Or do you mean that two message exchanges with the same pattern and > same types for all the messages (and the same > endpoint/binding/whatever) should nevertheless be distinguishable (by > "operation")? > > The former seems quite plausible. The latter seems to require actually > distinguishing the messages :) Ah, I think I know where you are heading ;-). We are trying to solve the former, although the latter is also an interesting problem as well. > > Cheers, > Bijan Parsia. --umit > > -- Umit Yalcinalp Consulting Member of Technical Staff ORACLE Phone: +1 650 607 6154 Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 15:51:14 UTC