W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2004

RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:32:08 -0500
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B27165A0F@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <distobj@acm.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>



Hi Amy: 

> > OK, let's start this way.  Why do we bother with 
> <operation> at all in 
> > WSDL?
> 
> It establishes sequence and content of messages that are related.

OK, sounds good.  So why do we care about that?

--Glen

Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 11:37:09 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amelia A Lewis: "Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"
Previous message: Amelia A Lewis: "Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"
Maybe in reply to: Umit Yalcinalp: "2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"
Next in thread: Amelia A Lewis: "Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"
Reply: Amelia A Lewis: "Re: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:42 GMT