RE: 2004-02-12 Action Item: Clarification to the OperationName feature from Glen Daniels on 2004-02-23 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:32:08 -0500
To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <distobj@acm.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B27165A0F@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>

Hi Amy: 

> > OK, let's start this way.  Why do we bother with 
> <operation> at all in 
> > WSDL?
> 
> It establishes sequence and content of messages that are related.

OK, sounds good.  So why do we care about that?

--Glen

Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 11:37:09 UTC