In-Reply-To=<37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CD21F@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk> References=<37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CD21F@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk> > > I'm not sure whether having the Operation Name in the message > > is always necessary > > +1 to that. To paraphrase a regularly paraphrased phrase: "The first > thing you have to learn is that there is no operation." Well, there is an operation, because the message is requesting that *something* be done, no? Not including it in the message just makes the message less self-descriptive than the alternative of putting the operation name in it. I like self-descriptiveness, so I want to see it there. Of course, you could use a generic method. 8-) Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Sunday, 22 February 2004 18:06:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:29 GMT